Three problems are seen from the results of agricultural machinery quality survey

The survey was conducted by the relevant units of the Ministry of Agriculture on the quality survey of some large and medium-sized wheeled tractors and self-propelled corn harvesters based on the Agricultural Mechanization Promotion Law and the Agricultural Machinery Quality Survey Measures. Therefore, in terms of sex, the surveys made by some social survey institutions are more credible and influential.

Three problems are seen from the results of agricultural machinery quality survey

In fact, the results of this survey generally reflect the fundamentals of the current quality of these two categories of agricultural machinery products. For example, this time John Deere, who ranks as a tractor, has a good reputation among users.

Analysis of the results of this survey can also be seen from the following aspects.

First, the product quality of a large enterprise is not necessarily better than that of a small enterprise, or the product quality of a well-known enterprise is not necessarily better than that of a less well-known enterprise. From this survey, we saw that Luoyang Shiying Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd. SJH1104 ranked 5th with a comprehensive score of 88.25, and DQ554 of Yantai Dongqi Agricultural Equipment Co., Ltd. also ranked 11th.

It should be said that in the field of tractors, the two companies should be regarded as latecomers with a lack of reputation, but they can also rank among the top 32 companies that accept quality surveys, indicating that small and medium-sized agricultural machinery companies will also produce products that exceed the quality of large enterprises. As long as the industry entrants do a good job of product quality, sooner or later, they will be recognized by consumers. Of course, this time there are more unknown tractor company products that have not been investigated. I hope that this list will see more brands in the coming year.

Second, the quality of products of the same enterprise is high or low. We have seen that there are a number of products from the same company showing the quality of the questionnaire, some products have higher scores, and some products have lower scores. This shows that domestic enterprises need to improve in the overall control of product quality. In reality, some of our companies have better quality of this batch of products, and the quality of another batch of products may be poor; the quality of the products tested is good, and the quality of products produced by large-scale production is poor; Better, the performance of work in another area is poor. This is a problem that enterprises need to pay attention to in the future.

Third, the quality indicators of foreign brands are not necessarily higher than domestic brands. The survey results show that some of the well-known foreign agricultural machinery companies' products, this comprehensive score ranking is far less than domestic enterprises. We know that measuring the overall quality performance of a company should include its product quality, service quality, job quality and maintenance quality.

Some foreign-funded enterprises are too dependent on dealers or agents in China for after-sales service. They are doing poorly in terms of timeliness and thoughtfulness in after-sales service. Some foreign-funded enterprises have fewer service outlets in China, and repair parts are difficult to buy, which undoubtedly affects Its overall word of mouth. Therefore, foreign-funded enterprises in China still need to combine China's national conditions to provide better services to consumers, nor can they be ahead of some domestic enterprises in terms of their own product manufacturing quality.

It is hoped that the results of the quality survey released by the Ministry of Agriculture will promote more and more agricultural machinery enterprises to pay more attention to quality work.

(Original title: What is the mystery revealed by the Agricultural Machinery Quality List of the Ministry of Agriculture?)